Islam has elevated the status
of women in Islam. Many, upon hearing this, might assume it to be an
oxymoron because the prevalent idea - at least in the West - is that Islam does
not elevate the status of women, but that Islam oppresses and suppresses
women.
In relation to this, it must be said that today, there are basically two world views. These two views are often in conflict - not only on the personal level where individual human beings are making choices, but also on the international level in terms of the debate over the authenticity and correctness of these two world views.
In relation to this, it must be said that today, there are basically two world views. These two views are often in conflict - not only on the personal level where individual human beings are making choices, but also on the international level in terms of the debate over the authenticity and correctness of these two world views.
The first world view is the
Western liberal view. A view which claims to draw its roots from the
Judeo-Christian tradition that probably, upon investigation, is more well
rooted in the ideas that appeared after the reformation; ideas that are rooted
in secularism and the world view that appeared thereafter during the ‘era of
enlightenment’.
The second view is that of the
Muslims - the Islamic world view, and this view says that its roots and ideas
lie in the revelation given by God (or Allah in Arabic) to Prophet Muhammad,
may the mercy and blessings of God be upon him. Those who proclaim this
view say that it can be used by humanity during all ages and times, and that
its relevance and benefit is not restricted to a certain period of time,
geographic area or certain race of human beings. Likewise, the adherents
of the first view, that of Western secularism and the liberal tradition,
believe that their world view, ideas, culture and civilization are the best for
humanity. An American author of Japanese decent (Francis Fukuyama) wrote
a book entitled, “The End of Time”. In this book he basically put forth
the theory that human development in terms of its ideas has concluded with this
final period of liberal secular thought and nothing more will come to
humanity. However in his book he adds that that the only part of the
world which has not adopted this secular human view is the Islamic world and
proposes that there will be a conflict in terms of this ideology in the Islamic
world.
With that brief introduction,
one of the topics of contention between these two world views, that of the
secular liberal view in the West and the Islamic tradition, concerns
women. What is the position and status of women? How are women
looked at? Are women elevated in one culture and oppressed in another?
The Western view is that women
are elevated only in the West and that they are getting more and more rights
with the passage of time, while their sisters - they say - in the Islamic world
are still being suppressed. The Muslims who they encounter say that in
actuality it is the Islamic system that provides the true freedoms for men and
women alike, and women in the West as well as men, are deceived into an idea of
freedom which really doesn’t exist.
How women are understood in
Islam cannot be properly understood - and this is more significant, I feel -
unless one understands exactly what we might call the philosophical basis or
ideological understanding - since this is really a theological concept.
First, let’s review how exactly
women were thought of and understood in the western tradition, to compare and
contrast perspectives. We know that the western tradition sees itself as
the intellectual inheritors of the Greek tradition that existed before Prophet
Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, and so therefore many of the intellectual
traditions of the West are found to some degree in the writings of the early
Greek philosophers like Aristotle, Plato, etc.
How did they view women?
What were the ideas of Aristotle and Plato regarding women? When
one reviews the works of these early Greek philosophers, he finds that they had
very disparaging views of women. Aristotle in his writings argued that
women were not full human beings and that the nature of woman was not that of a
full human person. As a result, women were by nature deficient, not to be
trusted and to be looked down upon. In fact, writings describe that the
free women in many aspects of the Greek society - except for the very few women
of the elite classes - had positions no better than animals and slaves.
This Aristotelian view of women
was later carried on into the early Christian tradition of the Catholic
Church. Saint Thomas of Aquinas in his writings proposed that women were
the trap of Satan. The issue of Adam and Eve added a dimension to the
earlier Greek ideas of Aristotle; women were the cause of the downfall of man
and therefore were Satan’s trap and should be looked at with caution and
weariness because they caused the first downfall of humanity and all thus evil
precedes from women. This type of thought was persistent within the
writings of the Church fathers throughout the Middle Ages. In their
writings we find this theme proposed in one aspect or another. However,
after the Protestant reformation Europe decided to free itself from the shackles and chains
of the Catholic Church. Ideas which have been entitled as the Age of
Enlightenment or thought of as such, caused them to feel that they needed to
free themselves from many of these ideas. Some of these ideas were
scientific in nature that the earth goes around the sun, instead of the sun
going around the earth; theological in nature, as in the writings of Martin
Luther; and also social in nature, like the position of women in society.
However, the writers of the Enlightenment still carried this basic theme that
was not much of a switch - women where not full human beings. French
writers during the revolution, like Rousseau, Voltaire and others, looked at
women as a burden that needed to be taken care of. Due to this Rousseau
in his book “Emile”, proposed a different form of education for women based
upon the fact that women were unable to understand what men were able to
understand.
